/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5613709
http://www.threelas.com/2011/11/hawking-radiation-proven-successful-for.html

No, you don't actually need to sit a black hole in a lab and watch it. Hawking radiation is an intrinsic property of event horizons, regardless of their origin.

mfw calculus

>>3835990
I'm getting sick from all this circular reasoning.
>you achieve equality through liberation
>can't be liberated until declared equal

You need to leave.

>>3395012
>can't see shit below planck scale
>conclusive

>>2546640

Got any more incredulity-based hogwash?

>>2531057

Auras do not exist. You are delusional or, more likely, intentionally being untruthful.

Furthermore anecdotes and eyewitness testimony is less than worthless to science. Even if such a phenomena were real and you personally witnessed it, it is inadmissible as evidence and we cannot use it.

>>2446004
>no observations made
>no testable hypothesis

>>1704551

http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/ardlouis/dissipative/QAtunneling.html

Anything up to and including macroscopic objects can potentially tunnel; there's nothing in existing theory to preclude the possibility. It's astronomically unlikely due to the massive simultaneity required, but then again this thread is already considering incredibly unlikely events.

But I digress. Only one atom is required to break this "quarantine" and we already know those can indeed tunnel.

>>1472864

The star loses all of its outward pressure and collapses upon itself once it starts fusing iron, because the fusion of iron robs it of energy rather than producing it. The shock wave known as a supernova is one of the results of this sudden collapse.

They left mirrors on the moon after the landing so they could reflect lasers. Fucking idiots.

>>1107773

No such thing happens. Ejections are the result of a small fraction of accreting matter that attains sufficient speed and energy to be thrown away from the black hole before it reaches the event horizon. Nothing ever comes from the black hole itself.