/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14696034
>Who's they?
Any groupthink, but ultimately "no one specific". How else would they avoid accountability? I hear computers and AI are tar and feather resistant.

>Who says that our planet is warming because of fertilizers?
You do. That is the "1% outliers of the population who are simply covered the most by mainstream media". Using the guise of "climate change" (the meaning of which is reified as science goes along), Sri Lanka STARVED because it was deemed that nitrogen fertilizers were just too....vigorous for the atmosphere to handle. So instead they used alternatives which produced only 20% of yield. The Dutch now want to implement the same type of agenda and are being met with protests by farmers who understand how suicidal it is. Trudeau also just announced the plan to do the same with Canada and I fully expect dear leader in the US to do the same at some point.

So why does the populace just absolutely crumple to its knees when shit like this happens? Why it's so simple, it's really because they pay them to just stand out of the way. Your benefits? Your social security? Your dole? Your retirement? You want that don't you? You don't want to be an absolute fool and throw all of that away after already slaving for it for so long do you? Oh and your families, your children. They're part of this too you know? You don't want to be the minority, the black sheep in your family do you? What would your wife/husband think? Bad enough you wouldn't get our dole, they might think you're some kind of schizo and cut you off from their wealth (leaving more for us when they die and lose it to taxes.

>>14696082
>Literally every word of this statement is wrong
Oh you're right, I do apologize for using an explanation instead of confusing and deluding myself with countless of fancy descriptions that distract from the big picture. Words do matter, especially the correct/expurgated ones.