/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11899038

>Could this be true, is this how science works?

No, it's akin to stating the entire world is conspiring against you. There's way too many players in the academic field globally for a supposed false narrative like that to be pushed without multiple governments pushing back hard if the evidence was to the contrary.

Stop listening to retards and use your brain. How many countries do you really think would be inclined to waste billions on a secret cover up?

>>11486249

Not him but no, it reduces the time frame the virus lasts in terms of individual retention. It doesn't change the fact that people will still have to distance themselves from each other. It doesn't change the fact that the most vulnerable are still at the same risk of death once they catch it. And it doesn't change the fact that you first have to test people to prove if they have the virus or not.

This isn't a vaccine, this does not prevent you from getting Covid 19, it does not reduce how inherently infectious it is (only reduces the individual retention), it doesn't resolve the air and surface retention issue that helps it's spread. And lastly from reading the paper it does not guarantee reinfection which is an issue experts fear may happen in future waves later this year.

It's good that we have figured out a treatment but do not confuse it for a cure.