/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10131044
>There is nothing to respond to

I just asked you a question moron, you know what a "question" is right? Sorry you're so dumb that you can't even answer a simple question and can't even bother to elaborate what "semantic babble" is. Is it because you know the answer and are just too cowardly to say it? >>>/pol/ is that way.

>>10090810

>So two perfectly tuned crystal oscillators that are vibrating in perfect harmony are completely arbitrary and we are deluding ourselves into thinking they're consistent. Same for atomic clocks.
Uhh, yeah? It depends on the QUALITY of the crystal.

>Last time I brought up neutrons you didn't reply. I wonder why.
read >>10084458 >>10084462. If that was your reply, you answered your own question.

>Yeah, that bends space time.
Yeah well leprechauns bend adamantium, because I say they exist and can do so.

>Hey, that's fair enough but it doesn't address my point.
Yes it does. Now on your way, bub.

>The only thing that matters is that we define them in a way that they are consistent.
consistent in terms of what? What we say it is? Lol.

>When I have plans for a house drawn up the units they use are completely arbitrary, but the builder doesn't build a house for ants instead of a house for humans. No, the builder builds the house to the scale envisioned because those arbitrary units have been defined in a way that we can use them consistently.
This is not how the universe builds things.