/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4750029
Christianity does actually have predictive power.

If christianity is scientifically useful then Jesus will appear

If christianity is not useful then he won't.

Thus we can falsify christianity by waiting for christ

So christianity should be considered a valid scientific theory!

>>4624283
Dear OP, look up L'Hopital's rule. 0/0 is an indeterminate form. You need to take the limit of x as it approaches zero.

>Not wanting to live forever

>implying your opinion of a subject is a fact

no.

>MFW OP is Aether

>>2607362
confirmed /b/tard

>>2319196
STOP WATCHING SO MUCH ANIME!

>>1916528
>Entropy seems to dictate that 1+1 will equal 2 but slightly slower every time.

WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? 1+1=2 is derived form Set theory you dumbass, which is derived from the standard set of mathematical axioms (Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory).

>>1836987
>Wasnt going to the moon the stepping point for going to mars? How are we going to get to mars if we don't go to the moon first? Smells fishy.

...yeah, no.

The Moon is about as similar to Mars as Antarctica is to the interior of my ass.

There are many natural processes which can be used to estimate the faggotry of OP. Henry M. Morris, Ph.D. of the Institute for Faggotry Research has an article called "The Faggot OP" at http://quizilla.teennick.com/quizzes/7681704/are-you-a-faggot.. In it, he shows a table of 76 different processes in nature that can be used to estimate the faggotry of OP. The table includes processes such as the influx of various penises into his orifices, the number of times his balls touched, the accumulation of AIDS, and many other processes. Of these 76 processes:

26 show OP to be a gigantic faggot
15 show OP to be a total faggot
11 show OP to be more than a simple faggot
5 show OP to be a simple faggot
13 show OP to be kinda faggy
6 show OP to be maybe bi-curious
None of the 76 processes show OP to be more than a bit nonfaggot
More than half of these processes show OP to be more faggot that a bucket of balls touching each other. And the bucket is made of cocks.

It should be noted that these processes assume uniformity and further assume that none of the daughter component (the faggotry being calculated) was present in the sample in the beginning. If any of the daughter component was present in the sample in the beginning, then that would cause the actual OP to be even faggier.

The assumption of uniformity, that all conditions remained constant over the period of the measurement, is much more likely to be correct for large amounts of faggotry than for small amounts. Therefore, the estimates that yield greater faggotry are more likely to be accurate. Yet the OP says he is less of a faggot than even the faggier of the estimates shown above. But they certainly do not say this by preponderance of the evidence.

>>1516881
>>DURRRR
no, atheism means not believing in a god you fucking stupid bag of dicks, it has nothing to say on the existence of anything.

click here to learn more you stupid 'agnostic' moron
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-theism

>>1428069
LMAO, sure buddy.
just keep telling yourself that.

Thats what I can an engineering was of looking at shit....HA HA HA HA

>>1401173
>smokes wood
>smokes dicks

>>1340187

>>1294326
>>DURRR
No they are here you stupid shit, thats why its called a science board, no one gives a shit about authority especially on an anonymous image board, do you actually believe that bullshit? We have a ridiculous amount of content all dumped into one place by the people who like it and a bit of email chat taking place day by day about it, If thats not an interest in science then fuck you, no one has an interest in anything by definition, the fact that we even started such a library where as most faggots just make a big image file of the books you should get clearly shows our dedication to the subject regardless of an individuals credentials.

>>1240408
Shit tier major detected