/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14843313
>It's not a wave, it's a wave function. It has wave-like behavior and particle-like behavior.
Cool description. And it is "wave-like" how? A wave is not something, it's what something else does.

>Why is a medium required for movement?
>movement
Again with implying the movement with no proof. Please substantiate your claims.

>No one said they do.
So what is traveling then? It cannot be an electromagnetic phenomena otherwise

>So far you have provided zero evidence of a medium for light or explained why you think it's necessary.
Because there is no other way. It wouldn't exist otherwise.

>You just keep repeating over and over that it is
You imply it's "wave-like". So there must be a medium.

>You attempted to claim a vacuum is defined
"No thing whatsoever". It is literally no specific thing, and yet still a subject matter spoken of to be referred to as "thing to be spoken of". Forgive me if that comes off as disingenuous, but that's why I elaborated later on.

>It's a vacuum with light in it
A contradiction.

>>14843347
>more revisionist history.
>quotes all the things physics proved.

>The medium for light.
Oh that theory of the aether. No. Now which aether theory do you want to move onto next?

>How is this false?
Neither have properties to perform a scientific experiment on. One is purely conceptual, technically both are.

>How did you determine this?
I'm not the one claiming they exist with no proof whatsoever other than a description of them existing.

>But it does.
It proves the medium induction has a maximum rate.

>>14843427
>Show me proof of aether.
Light induced to exist. Magnets.

>Nonsensical question.
Because you can't answer it?
"What properties does space have"
"How is the separation caused"

If you can't answer these then it must be imaginary.

>A cause is an event separate from the effect
relational to the effect, moron.

>>14843433
>I won't stop describing
Then it's pointless talking to you. You can't explain shit.

>>14479636
Because it was never right.

>>14479247
The heard it in school a lot so they just take it for granted.

>>14479222
>GPS wouldn't work and satellites would be crashing into your house if we didn't account for relativity
Elaborate, because no GPS system accounts for anything said by Einstein (and those that haven't elaborated on how their systems work is because it's classified).

>Scanning tunneling microscopes literally rely on Quantum mechanical effects to image samples.
They rely on electricity lol.

>>14480423
Don't argue with him, just tell him he's wrong and move on.

>>14480103
"waves" of any sort are absolutely irreconcilable without consideration of a medium.

>Maxwell demonstrating that this is not possible is literally why we abandoned the existence of ether as a hypotheses.
They abandoned ONE theory of the ether with a null result. This proves nothing, this disproves nothing. But somehow was the basis for an "explanation" in the form of Einsteins false reification of Space and Time.

>>12731751
They're afraid of shadows, anon. Literally.

>>12725616
>how?
>>12725847
My brother collects models of Gundams. Where can I find a real one?
>>12725900
>since waves like light
"light" is the visible phenomeena of an electromagnetic waveform yes. Now "Waves" of what? It must be "waves of space" right? Wonder what "Space" is made of? It seems like a misnomer to name something that's actually "filled" as something that implies it's "Spacious".

>>12717039
>>12717051

>>12717019
>And yet physicists use it extensively