/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4303416
>Implying anyone who can recognise the fact that something non-falsifiable and subjective isn't a science is a scientologist

>>2710174

if i did not get you substantially wrong:
if you were to rule, you'd be willing to favor a decision of someone that you yourself call an expert over the decision of the majority of the ruled region's people?

maybe i'm not gonna continue the collection of material to backup my claims. arguing with you people is ridiculous, you're lacking the most basic knowledge of science, society and psychology.

Really, you're trying too hard.
-1/10