/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4993770
Well i hope you're not implying that we're still at their level. Speculation is one thing, but genuine possibility is another. Technology is advancing at a rate much faster than ever could have been anticipated. Our understanding of these types of phenomenon and physical principles is only just starting to blossom.

Is it impossible at this point in time? Yes. Does that mean it will always remain so? Who knows, its foolish to claim with certainty either possibility.

>>4990300
I think you're forgetting that within that small, insignificant alteration is the foundation for all our differences.

What im saying is that a trinary system is inherently more complex than a binary system. This implies that a human being will always be more intellectually adept than a standard 'machine' as well understand them to be. All it takes is something as simple as introducing a singular dimension of informational transference in order to exponentially increase the capacity for a potentially, virtually, infinitely more complex thought process.

its the potential for expression thats important.