[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14873846 [View]
File: 25 KB, 645x773, 075d83e915-1486728787177.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14873846

you have a 33% chance of losing by switching
not 0%
not <5%
not a negligible chance of losing
33 fucking percent

imagine the feeling of being any of the non-negligible amount of people who unknowingly picked the car door then switched to a goat

>> No.14849191 [View]
File: 25 KB, 645x773, 075d83e915-1486728787177.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14849191

where a cube obviously has 6 sides, I think a sphere may only really have 2 sides. It's becoming some strange artifact in my math that it looks like spheres cheat curvature in a funny way, which yes they do. Traveling a quarter the way around a sphere, turning 90 degrees, traveling another quarter, turning 90 degrees, and one more quarter gets you right back where you started in a 270 degree triangle. The weird part is how a sphere intersects a normal object like a cube. The obfuscated faces on a cube subducting the sphere might have the sphere peaking out over each of the 6 faces clearly, yet the traced circle areas on the cube would have more surface area missing from the cube than the sphere's measured surface area for those sections.

i need empirical physical testing before I go further since things are teetering between 2.96 and 4.93

bros spheres are bullshit

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]