/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15721361
Time is an emergent property of 3D space travelling with a constant velocity (what we call speed of light) in a higher dimension. The "friction" against this higher-dimensional "medium" is slowing matter down and is responsible for the emergence of mass.

Massless particles do not experience time because they don't interact with anything. By moving in the opposite direction of the movement of space within higher-dimensional "medium", from the perspective of the latter they are essentially standing still. As soon as they collide or interact with something, they are "nudged" slightly against the "medium" which makes them no longer travel at the speed of light (and no longer be massless) for a limited duration.

You can't appear to go faster than the speed of light within our 3D space because if you could, you would GAIN mass as a result of relative motion against the "medium" (now in the opposite direction), and you need to LOSE mass to appear faster. This impossibility of "faster than the speed of light" is equivalent to the impossibility of "stiller than absolute stillness". In fact, depending on frame of reference, these two statements describe exactly the same thing.

However, "moving faster" than the speed of light IS possible in higher-dimensional medium. As stated previously, by going faster than the speed of light you GAIN mass because you start moving relative to the "medium", but in the opposite direction, which is exactly what antimatter is doing.
Matter-antimatter annihilation is simply their speeds cancelling out and becoming equal to speed of light – zero.
Why is there more matter than antimatter? Because our 3D space travels uniformly with a constant velocity as a single unified object – everything around us moves in the same direction through the "medium", so we perceive it as matter. Outside of our moving "bubble", however, nothing stops arbitrarily large quantities of "antimatter" from existing.

>>15482889
Time is how we perceive the amount of interaction between matter. Every single interaction between particles contributes to the "advancement" of time. In the areas of the universe where a lot of mass is concentrated, time flows faster, because there's more matter and thus more interactions between constituent particles. If we take take some objects that move close to the speed of light, time flows slower for them, because their cone of causality shrinks, limiting the amount of stuff they can interact with. Photons basically don't experience time because moving at light speed, they don't interact with anything. When they eventually do bump into something, for a brief period they are no longer moving at light speed, thus progressing in time.

>>14837302
>Where could someone actually get arrested for reading an illegal opinion about the Jews and their activities in the west?
I won't mention where for their benefit.

>Why should I not spam the anti-semitism equivalent of the Tiannamen Square copy-pasta every time I encounter a person from such a place?
Because as I said, it's inconvenient for the people who live places that scan/censor that sort of thing. It's for their own benefit, but I'm not telling you what to do or post.

>>14837399
>Considering that Tesla himself claimed to have invented some weapons of mass destruction it really is no wonder the feds were always watching him.
They weren't always watching him. In fact they didn't even exist until after he already invented most of the shit he did.

>>12718249
My bad, I thought >>12717019 was referring to "math".

>>12551496

Actual brainlet here, check my sick schizo theory.

Time is an emergent property of 3D space travelling with a constant velocity (what we call speed of light) in a higher dimension. The "friction" against this higher-dimensional "medium" is slowing matter down and is responsible for the emergence of mass.

Massless particles do not experience time because they don't interact with anything. By moving in the opposite direction of the movement of space within higher-dimensional "medium", from the perspective of the latter they are essentially standing still. As soon as they collide or interact with something, they are "nudged" slightly against the "medium" which makes them no longer travel at the speed of light (and no longer be massless) for a limited duration.

You can't appear to go faster than the speed of light within our 3D space because if you could, you would GAIN mass as a result of relative motion against the "medium" (now in the opposite direction), and you need to LOSE mass to appear faster. This impossibility of "faster than the speed of light" is equivalent to the impossibility of "stiller than absolute stillness". In fact, depending on frame of reference, these two statements describe exactly the same thing.

However, "moving faster" than the speed of light IS possible in higher-dimensional medium. As stated previously, by going faster than the speed of light you GAIN mass because you start moving relative to the "medium", but in the opposite direction, which is exactly what antimatter is doing.
Matter-antimatter annihilation is simply their speeds cancelling out and becoming equal to speed of light – zero.
Why is there more matter than antimatter? Because our 3D space travels uniformly with a constant velocity as a single unified object – everything around us moves in the same direction through the "medium", so we perceive it as matter. Outside of our moving "bubble", however, nothing stops arbitrarily large quantities of "antimatter" from existing.