[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11692019 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x570, thinkinh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692019

alright bros im really unedicated in math and need this calculation for a video game. Lets say event A has a 10% Chance of awarding Reward B. Now you could get really unlucky and have Event A not reward you the reward like 50 times in a row... but how many times would Event A have to happen to grant you a 99% Chance to actually give you Reward B 10% of the time +/- 0.1%

>> No.10755269 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x570, 56.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10755269

>>10755256
Just wait, a traumatic event will happen in your life and it's gonna replay over and over in your head, anon. You'll be wishing you had aphantasia.

>> No.10715012 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x570, 56.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10715012

I think we're looking at it all wrong, lads.

Humans haven't really had an event for awhile that would improve our genes via survival of the fittest.

Climate change and the following food/water shortages is just what we need as a species to improve our genes.

>> No.9698871 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x570, 1519367905542.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9698871

>>9696125
the thing is that sum of the spins that compose the universe can be non-zero, but once normalized it should be pretty close to zero. It's the same argument as why we consider most macroscopic thing to be electrically neutral, of course it's most likely that an object doesn't have exactly the same number of positive and negative particle, but the total charge is pretty close to zero anyway.

>> No.9566153 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x570, 56.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9566153

[math]\lim_{\theta\to\infty}sin(\theta) [/math]

>> No.9360551 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x570, 56.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9360551

Too lazy to test and record the results myself, but if you recorded the Pepe to non-Pepe image ratio of each board over time, would you find that each board generally has a unique consistent Pepe to non-Pepe ratio?

Would you be able to make a reasonably accurate guess of what board your viewing from the number of Pepes alone?

Of course some boards will never have Pepes like the porn boards, it would make sense to rule them out.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]