/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11967311
I know that it really seems bizarre but it's not. This is their goal. Every single thing that they do is very intentional and calculated. The girl in the pic sounds fucking retarded and as if she's being paid to falseflag, but she's smarter than the average BLM grunt. What she's doing is testing the ground for whether the new religion of BLM can finally overwrite the objectivity of science and completely cancel empiricism as a forbidden school of thought. And it will sound impossible that society would ever allow something like this, but let me remind you that any person from the 90s would've laughed in your face if you told him what 2020 looked like. It will follow the exact same path that it follows right now: first they push it, then their white liberal orbiters push it, then the companies push it, then the government pushes it, and finally the only ones who do not push it get ostracized and fired from their jobs so they start pushing it as well. Then, if it doesn't work, they go one step backwards and yield this position until it's slowly normalized, after which they just push it again. The fact that pointing out all of this automatically makes you an evil racist who needs to be excommunicated makes them immune and gives them infinite attempts until it eventually works, because there's no one out there who'll bother losing his position just so he could call out some random twitter post for being retarded. There's tens of thousands of proffs who can easily call her out and use their PhD as a shield, but they wont. Instead the reverse will happen - the PhDs will join her to display how progressive they are, and regardless of how fucking retarded this all sounds, they will be the ones to legitimize her retardation and use their degrees to cancel any other mathematician still claiming that 2 + 2 = 4.