/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8772553
>alluvial action
ALL OF THIS

>>8749655
>He wasn't entirely wrong, just technically wrong. His grammar was acceptable in most circles.
And I wouldn't have cared except he was """"correcting"""" someone else's grammar. If you're gonna call out picayune errors, they better actually be errors or you're just looking like a moron.
>You should try that sometime, apologizing.
niBBa I'll apologize when I'm actually wrong about something, not when I hurt some anon's feelings on a Jivaroan head-shrinking imageboard.

>>8749681
>hurr if something can be done about it why isn't anything being done about it?
because deniers have enough political clout to stop shit from getting done, like >>8749686 said.
there have been some advances made recently (Paris etc) but they haven't had time yet to really take effect

>>8749691
>William Happer
literally offered to write a pro-CO2 piece in exchange for money, fake a peer-review process, and conceal the source of the funding.
>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/08/greenpeace-exposes-sceptics-cast-doubt-climate-science
actual corporate whore

>>8749695
>conflating technical feasibility with political feasibility

>>8750240
>hey, let's claim that climate scientists said a bunch of different shit that they never actually said
>therefore the story keeps changing!
you can """"prove"""" ANYTHING if you're willing to just make shit up!

>>8750297
holy shit, absolutely BTFO
is there anything more gullible than a climate change denier?

>>8603621
>hey, this fossilized fly and lizard look kinda like their modern homologs
>they haven't changed at all, therefore evolution didn't happen to them
>they've been the same since the world was created back in 4004 B.C.
>>except it takes about three MILLION years for copal to turn into amber
>*crickets*

it's really just a joke on new earth creationists, but practically all vocal creationists come back to that eventually.

>>8603613
>>8604337
>hey guise what if
>what if we say that WE have evidence to support our claims
>and THEY don't!
>maybe it'll make people pay attention to us?