/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4231284
Are you trying to be serious? Because it appears they you don't know basic logic. What you have said may seem "correct" to you, but it is not a reasonably or logically sound argument. You are just stating irrelated opinions. Nothing more. Basically you doing religion.

>Commercially viable products benefit more people than they cause harm to. That much is obvious.

Nope. You are assuming shit, through some kind of "anchor" reasoning (which is incorrect).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring

>Needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

This is your opinion. This is not a fact.

>So as far as experimentation is concerned, if it is commercially viable it is probably ethical

This statement is just nonsensical. You say that commerical viability implies (=>) ethical. None of your other statements (even if they were true), would lead to this.

All you are stating is unrelated opinions. You aren't using any logic or reason in your thinking. You should think alittle more next time. Remember logic and reason is your friend. Logic and reason requires some forethought and dedication, IT ISN'T THE SAME THING AS JUST STATING RANDOM OPINIONS!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_biconditional