/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7730671
Would you stop acting stupid and ignorant. Its being coming more and more clear that you're acting in bad faith; purposefully mis-interpreting things. The uncorrected data peak in a roughly similar time as the solar data. that's the bottom line.

Now of course, your graph "proving" that solar activity does drive temperature is based on a ridiculous assumption of an essentially linear relationship between basic solar activity (and nothing else).

Even a simple non-linear approach, e.g., sun-spot integrals (and ocean oscillations) explains most of the variance. Pic related.

Seriously, between your inability to read ocean level graphs, your simple minded linear assumptions, etc. I really think you're lacking in fundamental analytical abilities. Perhaps you're just blinded by your ideology.