/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16020445
Get the zionist out and let Shotwell run everything

/trash/thread/59892326#p60010659

>>8684343

Hey digitalbro, how are you
>Good, just spent the last 6 hours fucking 9999 digital bitches and living out 30 years of awesome adventures. You
Well I just got fired and found out I have cancer soon after
>Sorry, wasn't listening, fucking more digital bitches

I say test it some more. Put it up against a control, like a version without the cone shape, or some other part changed, and see if that makes any thrust. Then you can point to an outside factor if the control still makes thrust. Next, you can also start playing around with the design more, make a prototype that is easier to replicate and make an exact copy of to test and retest.

This chink claim sounds more like propaganda, like "we had a successful test in space" is actually "we tested it in space, and the test was completed, successfully. It never DID make thrust, but we concluded the test without fault, so it was successful!" Now popsci is fanning the flames with claims it COULD be being tested on the X-37 spaceplane. Great job there PS, go back to selling hoverboards and 9/11 debunks.

So what is the problem with testing it more? If its the cost, open a god damn crowdfunding page. If it doesn't work, meh, who gives a fuck. If it does work, no only do we get SPEHS, we get the possibility of perpetual motion machines. Fuck nuclear fusion when you have infinite energy!