/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14741527
>Nah. The default position is you have no argument against peer reviewed research that has been replicated over and over again.
And yet you failed to even provide peer reviewed research which has failed worldwide

>If you don't understand the paper then your opinion is irrelevant.
Oh the fucking irony

>Your opinion is irrelevant.
AKA you literally have no argument

>They have been so far. We can only act based on the knowledge we have
Yeah and their assessment is faulty as fuck since we're now in a middle of an energy crisis because of these retarded green think-tank

>The article does that.
Literally not as evident by all the failings of retarded green people