/sci/ - Science & Math

/sci/, if you would, tell me how fucking retarded I am for thinking these things I'm about to say. Don't hold back, I want to feel suicidal by the end of this:


One of the dumbest things of modern physics is to treat light as something that travels. It has no mass, it doesn't travel and doesn't have a speed.

The light is emitted from a starting point to affect all directions and all distances at the same time. The illusion of light "travelling" is simply us witnessing the speed that causality processes something that expands everywhere and is not bound by mass, speed or time.

If you look at it from a far enough distance, causality won't process the effect of light as fully as it would closer to the source, and it will keep diminishing until a certain distance that won't even recognize the event (the light being emitted and changing its surroundings) ever took place. For some reason, the ripple of causality weakens the longer that it travels. This causes the illusion that the "universe is expanding".

The cause/consequence of something that happens in space, and the speed by which space acknowledges that it happened. That's all there is. The observable universe is a spatial bubble of causality. Everything outside of it, will never reach the center. Move the center, and the bubble will accompany it.


>photons
Literal fantasy. By the way, light emits energy but the energy emitted isn't the light itself. Treat the infinitesimal point that light is emitted from as a microscopic black hole, but of light. Instead of sucking the surrounding space into its center, its center "leaks" something into space, which is light. This infinitesimal small point releases energy, but the energy it emits isn't an intrinsic part that constitutes it, only an immediate consequence of its existence.

>>10611862
Honestly for me it’s no music. Music distracts me way too much

>>10602417
Heller has supported his claims the data is fraudulent many times. He doesn’t just look at US data he looks at global data as well. He also does not just average the stations and his analysis usually goes deeper than just mean temperatures anyway. And I already mentioned how Hausfather’s work is not in contradiction to Heller’s viewpoint. Assuming you have looked into Heller you should already know these things. You have looked into Heller like you said, right anon?

>>10601993
But I’m a junior in EE. What are you implying about us undergrads anon?

>>10600929
How retarded is it? Do you work with a lot of cucks? Do you think particle physics is for traps?

>>10595495

Stop bullying the CS student

there is no need for them anymore

i give them a good 5-10 years until people who are self educated by the internet just simply outskill uni sheeplets so hard its not even funny

>>9893094

Yeah.

Boredom gets diagnosed as "ADD" or "ADHD".

Do i just end myself?