/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12489378
I don't know, because this seems like a topic for EvoDevo biology, which is a topic I don't know much about. However, given my very limited understanding of population genetics and evolutionary biology, it would probably be a lot easier to create two different variants of a virus, one of which will replicate at a much faster rate, and the other which would replicate much slower and lie dormant for awhile before rapidly taking over the other one. This would just involve standard mechanism design, genetic engineering, and evolutionary modeling.

>>12464660
Hey anons. If I am trying to typeset a document in Latex is there a way that I can get it to automatically start new pages when I reach the bottom margin? I want to copy and paste natural language text from a Google doc into a Latex file, but I don't want to have to keep inserting new page for every page. Is there a way around this?

>>12405547
The future looks brighter with each passing day

>>12322537
We need to do more research, but I certainly don't think we should halt the use of 5G or anything like that. From what I understand, it's a great technology that is useful to literally hundred of millions of people in the US alone. However, I also think that it's important to remain open to the possibility that it could be dangerous. I don't think we need to be super concered about the issue, but science must always remain open to new evidence and data, and there must always be room for debate. After all, if we were wrong about something as robust and powerful as Newtonian mechanics, then we could certainly turn out to be wrong about 5G.

>>12136412
You're deflecting. What pol believes is irrelevant. They're a bunch of uneducated, low IQ inbred republican hicks who think Trump is hear to save America from the Satan worshiping pedos. By the same token far left activists on Twitter and Antifa losers are a bunch of low IQ, uneducated drug addicted trannies who think the world is run by whites nationalists and have uironically suggested that Trump is a Nazi who is setting up death camps to eradicate Mexicans. In reality the world is not under the hegemonic control of any single racial group. Yes there are some that have more power than others, but you can find corrupt, evil, and powerful people of literally every race.

The whole point of the post you are responding to is that this anon >>12136337 was engaging in rhetorical strategies that are intellectually dishonest. He is attacking a strawman, which is literally a logical fallacy, so he is either unintentionally stupid or he is intentionally misrepresenting people who are disagreeing with them. Calling someone a "Nazi" or a "white nationalist" because they disagree with cancel culture or they question the Russia-gate narrative is about as intellectually dishonest as calling someone a "communist" because they support police reform or a Green New Deal.

You're first reaction when you confront someone who challenges your own political viewpoints and values is to categorize them as some sort of "delusional conspiracy theorist" or some sort of "hateful white nationalist" so that you can just ignore them without addressing their arguments. This is the same thing that Trumptards do: anyone who disagrees with them is a socialist or a globalist, etc. You hear this on all the mainstream news outlets: turn on Fox News and you hear about how the democrats are pushing for communism and anarchy and all these Antifa revolutionaries are trying to destroy America. Turn on MSNBC and you hear about how Trump is an authoritarian, a bigot, white nationalist, etc.