/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5946362
to be clear the maximum point being 0.5666...66555

>>5860187
What does sexmean toyou?
Using themost repurposed wordspossible

>>5850273
>but you cant standardize the fact ofempirism with any simple justification
yeah but thats becausethe standardpfempirism is indicative of suuuchhhh alax style and buildup of justifications that the correlation is not bothered to have neccesary correletory standard with empiricism ....
>thats partially why it draws so many able bodied people to a fucking worming holing black hole that is the fucking BS world of Theology without method standpoint
.... and our varyation of a accounting for this just makes for such instinctual resonance of premise that our inductional sequencing just says to hell with it and tries to put all the millions of fallback equations into one play... and funny enough when introduced to that it still results in a personallity equivalent that still kinda looks like ' you'....which really just blows my mind in terms the 'your brain on notation'thing... fuck man reallity is rediculous

>>5816402
>Morals
Subjective interpretation on the axis of commonality in feasible maintaining of social architecture

>Human
Dicks

ITT: Morality = Human Sqrt

SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE

I AM THIS MAD