/sci/ - Science & Math

>which are actually true
>actually

>>10785889
>>10785848
You could really skew things by adding marginal people such as hermits, societal non-conformists, the homeless, psych patients, those assumed to have mental illness, etc.

>>10692942
>A quantum computer capable of truly factoring the number 21 is missing in action. In fact, the factoring of the number 15 into 3 and 5 is a bit of a parlour trick, as they design the experiment while knowing the answer, thus leaving out the gates required if we didn’t know how to factor 15. The actual number of gates needed to factor a n-bit number is 72 * n^3; so for 15, it’s 4 bits, 4608 gates; not happening any time soon.
I'm not a physicist, but isn't this clearly wrong?
https://phys.org/news/2014-11-largest-factored-quantum-device.html

>>10628403
The answer is obvious, bit shocked he hasn't been mentioned yet: Girgori Perelman

>>10587157
For an answer, let's check in with Mr. Perelman... (pic related)...And, all signs point to Yes!

>>10511279

>>10510123
>Grothendieck-Kazinsky syndrome
wut dis?
i get zip whence I google

solved the Poincare conjecture