/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11603742
HOW DID THIS MAN DO IT? HOW?

Abelian von Neumann algebra
Affiliated operator
Amenable group
Arithmetic logic unit
Artificial viscosity
Axiom of regularity
Axiom of limitation of size
Backward induction
Blast wave (fluid dynamics)
Bounded set (topological vector space)
Carry-save adder
Cellular automata
Class (set theory)
Computer virus
Commutation theorem
Continuous geometry
Coupling constants
Decoherence theory (quantum mechanics)
Density matrix
Direct integral
Doubly stochastic matrix
Duality Theorem
Durbin–Watson statistic
EDVAC
Ergodic theory
Explosive lenses
Game theory
Hilbert's fifth problem
Hyperfinite type II factor
Inner model
Inner model theory
Interior point method
Koopman–von Neumann classical mechanics
Lattice theory
Lifting theory
Merge sort
Middle-square method
Minimax theorem
Monte Carlo method
Mutual assured destruction
Normal-form game
Operation Greenhouse
Operator theory
Pointless topology
Polarization identity
Pseudorandomness
Pseudorandom number generator
Quantum logic
Quantum mutual information
Quantum statistical mechanics
Radiation implosion
Rank ring
Self-replication
Software whitening
Sorted array
Spectral theory
Standard probability space
Stochastic computing
Stone–von Neumann theorem
Subfactor
Ultrastrong topology
Von Neumann algebra
Von Neumann architecture
Von Neumann bicommutant theorem
Von Neumann cardinal assignment
Von Neumann cellular automaton
Von Neumann interpretation
Von Neumann measurement scheme
Von Neumann ordinals
Von Neumann universal constructor
Von Neumann entropy
Von Neumann Equation
Von Neumann neighborhood
Von Neumann paradox
Von Neumann regular ring
Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
Von Neumann universe
Von Neumann spectral theorem
Von Neumann conjecture
Von Neumann ordinal
Von Neumann's inequality
Von Neumann's trace inequality
Von Neumann stability analysis
Von Neumann extractor
Von Neumann ergodic theorem
Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem
ZND detonation model

>>9043812
>It happens to everyone sometimes. (R-right?)
*Blocks your path*
You wanna bet on that?

>>8755733

a set containing all previous numbers

>>8615546
>that professor who can't complete his proofs without turning to you
>that speaker at the seminar who obviously hasn't a clue what he is speaking about, but has everyone apparently enthralled
> that "gifted" kid that is always asking you how to solve homework problems which are completely trivial stuff you worked on when you were 14
>those non mathematicians who are always battling to get you to formalise the foundations of their respective domains
>those qt3.14 nerdy girls who blush and giggle when you walk past and are really quite a nuisance

Will the study of the laws of nature ever lead to the understanding and description of the contents of the universe?
Isn't studying the laws of nature while disregarding ontology much like studying the syntax of a language without actually ever paying attention to its contents?

Trying to disregard philosophy while doing science is as counterproductive as it gets imo.