[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9115199 [View]
File: 15 KB, 311x317, deliciauma.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9115199

>>9115171

Trans people are not women just because they want to, they have male chromosomes, they have male genitalia, they have a bunch o male characteristics that group them as male. The only possible theory that would make them female would be one wich cares about self-identification, what would be very dumb. But you said that you don't want self identification, right? So what do you suggest? What theory would put them as female?

Also, no, since the number of humans is finite if you plot all of them in a graph you would clearly get a discrete pattern, so no continuum for you.

The Xy/XX deffinition is a very useful one and just ignoring it to not make a small parcel of the population sad would be very stupid. I'm not claiming that it is philosophically sound, just that it's useful as fuck and that your rant is clearly your personal political cruzade to defend trans with no regard for science whatsoever.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]