[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12399914 [View]
File: 32 KB, 460x430, stoop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12399914

i have to do physics lab online, so it can be hard for me to guage uncertainties and stuff since everything is technically a supplied measurement (i.e, no uncertainty).

but today I have this thing, which spins when it is hit with a piston and we move the purple objects to adjust the rotational inertia and therefore acceleration. my question relates to the uncertainties present:

I place the objects along the axis, so I assume it's proper to assign some uncertainty value, say [math]\pm 0.01[/math]m. If I knew radius of this circle I could get the circumference, and apply some of that uncertainty to the angular speed value, but I can't. so now considering the speed value, I thought some appropriate uncertainties might be randomly applying something like [math]\pm 0.1^{\circ}[/math] and [math]\pm 0.1[/math]s (seconds).

does any of this make sense, or am I best to have no uncertainties in this situation? my prof is a bit of a stickler for them.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]