/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14969503
Imagine being this pathetic and unable to argue

>>14573589
Oh shame for you... you fell for my alucard.

Max Stirner made the comparison in the context of trolling the ever-loving shit out of the hegelians by centrally contrasting everything to the ego (quite literally "the ego and its own"). The context in which you relate his meaning, and his self evident actual meaning, are two very different things.

The sense in which it is gullible is the sense in which one confuses the owner for the thing owned. Stirner goes over that constantly, repeatedly, over and over again. It is in that sense, not the sense you've abused it, Stirner means that. That his feelings, ideas, thoughts, systems, and so on, are but unto him akin to property and to confuse those for things unto themselves is folly.

But do, please, tell us more about things you might've glossed over and didn't understand. I miss shitposting stirnerisms hidden in things.