/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9673777
They are implying their thoughts.

I started watching this series on YT about so-called "multiple proofs to God's existence," and I'm actually kind of interested in the topic. The guy explained some stuff that, even with my current intellect, can't really grapple with in terms of inconsistencies with science. First episode, he works around 2 main topics. The second argument is easy to deflate but the first, I'm having trouble with.

I'm not sure where I stand right now, I need closure and a thread on /sci to feel safe again.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbxD04LWW10

>>7446433

>>7186005

>>7105140
>None of that was implied
>Here's what he literally asks

>>6887510
>implying that OC happens here anymore

>>6797732
>implying you speak for the scientific community
>implying the peace prize impacts in any way on the other prizes

>>6762810
>>6762807
get a room you too

>>6756793
>implying limplying in the simulation implies implying is not real because implying is a processor going wirr-wirr and not implying implying is real because it exist on the implied simulator

check-mate, atheists

>>6718249
>implying you can stop gravity from affecting you
>implying joints don't wear out
>implying brain damage is already reverseable in 23th century
>implying aging is not a complex of diseases
>implying you won't become a shitty version of a cyborg in next few decades and those augmentations aren't irreversible until next millenium
>implying you won't get so fucked up by the world and won't have enough brain cells left to do something about it

keep dreaming, m8

If 0,9^n gets smaller when n-->infinity

Shouldn't this also apply to (0.999...)^n ?

>there exist some studies whose results are driven by personal economic motives
>scientists are human
>that means science is breaking
>IT'S HAPPENING

>>6038154

>>5912319
Dawkins hasn't appeared in a single one of his comics that I know of. He also mocks pop scientists and ther shenanigans every once in a while, like caring about scientists that were good with media over which were historically important or made good contributions:

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=2103#comic

or the retarded view nearly everyone has on Schöndiger's cat

http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=2524

He's a damn comic book writer drawing cartoons. I generally find them funny and occasionally he even tries to make a good point. I don't get why you should hate him.

>>5899165
Ok, you didn't even read the thread before going off like a autist.

The rocket could be fired after exiting the rail gun.

Now what?

>>5836585

Okay. So I want to teach myself higher mathematics. I want to go for fundamental calculus->linear algebra->ordinary differential equations -> (advanced calculus of multiple variables/vector calculus [is there a difference? Doesn't seem to be]) -> number theory -> graph theory -> tensor calculus

And then just learn general chem -> organic chem -> quantum mechanics

Please advise.

>>5776582
>>5776582
pt 6

A funny way to put this could be that a habit becomes addictive when it consistently interferes negatively with other habits.

At this point you might have guessed that when i say habit i mean pretty much everything you do, no matter of importance.
Because you can see that everything is really at core a "habit" if we take the dopaminergic approach.
So, the habit is physically present in your brain.
The only way to break the habit is to stop doing it the habit, if you stop doing it the synapses between the neurons that enable the habit will weaken over time.
The problem lies in the "stop doing it" if you can't stop doing it (addiction) how the fuck will you stop doing it to "stop doing it".
Lets keep this question in mind.
This approach you take if you want to cut a specific habit.
And then there's the other part, where you want to enable a habit.

Most of life is a continuous battle of acquiring positive habits and flushing down negative habits.
We talked about the acquisition of a habit and the flushing of a habit.
Again, if it was that easy, to start and stop habits we would all be living much satisfying lives.

Time passed, am tired, i'll continue next time.
I'll try to share my understanding on how we actually convince ourselves to acquire positive habits and throw hazardous ones.
We need to repeat something many times so it becomes integral to ourselves, but repeating alone isn't the key.
You can repeat many things and end up disgusted by them and never to repeat them.
It is about how you perceive them, i'll try to show some ways you can positively perceive and repeat things even if you couldn't initially so they can become a habit that you want to do.

>>5714791
>Implying this comparison is valid
>implying it hasn't been confirmed already that life is more possible than we initially thought.
>Implying there are not billions of planets with similar or better conditions than earth.
>implying the conditions of earth are required for these beings to survive.
>implying extraterrestrial life would mean intelligent extraterrestrial life.
>implying we can't make hypotheses before an experiment because that would be philosophee

/sci/ daily misc.
For things that dont deserve a whole thread.

Also am always open for a debate hence the tripfaggotry, i have never lost, argue everything with me and i'll prove you wrong, no bs(srs)

>>5521369
>implying we need thousands
>implying we just dont need maybe a 120+/- around the world

>>5433809
>parts so small it exceeds our current ability

>in a day and age where there are chunks of plastic and metal the size of your fingernail that can hold hundreds of GB's of data

>"run when walking or standing still is not a viable option" is too complicated for this

Are you fucking me?

>>5369875
>implying 'pure math guys' can't code
>implying pure math doesn't involve real world problems
>implying you have any experience with anything you're talking about