/sci/ - Science & Math

We must FEAR the carbon dioxide bogeyman. Who cares if spectral analysis clearly indicates a net cooling from CO2, or that a good explanation for the mechanism of a greenhouse effect which makes a lick of sense to anyone who understands the principal of equal and opposite reaction? It's time. CARBON TAXES FOR ALL (except the tax recipients).

>>10319470
>the graph is actually showing the exact opposite of what the data implies!
Clever last ditch effort to reign back in the consensus, I'll give that to ya.
For everyone else who is genuinely curious, spectral cooling does not imply the CO2 is trapping and holding onto to thermal energy. Rather it means exactly as it sounds, CO2 provides a conduit for thermal energy to convect and radiate out of Earth's atmosphere.

What is the /sci/ consensus on climate change?

Is it still happening or not? Are humans to blame or was it the sun's fault all along?