/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7602041
>the health hazards of it are highly controversial
No, they aren't.
On the one hand, there are people who know what they're talking about, and if were just them, there would be mild debate about some of the finer points of the subject.
On the other hand, there are poorly educated reactionaries who scream bloody murder about anything that "ain't natural".

>>7566420
>I already told you how,
His point is that you're apparently not qualified to run an entire society, despite your criticism of other societies.
Responding with a list of races you despise isn't much of a come-back, and only serves to prove his point.