/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14548876
/thread

Is this board as smart as it says it is?
https://lichess.org/6hfkCuqa

https://www.strawpoll.me/21037273

>>11872134
Fight me then
https://lichess.org/q0RIkqUV

cogito, ergo, est

>>11449180
How will you check his work?

What is pepe's IQ?

>>11348198
>In reality it shows fundamental stochasticism.

Your power level is like 5.
I know this because it is essential to know your enemy.
Superdeterminism is correct, consequence to being logically valid and sound, meaning that it is true, or that in all cases it corresponds exactly with reality in both predictive and analytical power.
Stochasticism is the notion that "randomness is fundamental" and not just an artifact of our predictive models and capabilities in measurement.
The notion of probability as some kind of force, like the notion of space as an object, is the equivalent of stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.

Get in here for a real game, lads
https://lichess.org/wjWd8V4r

give them free will

for you

d4
your move /sci/

Is it better to refuse to put your race on an application or to put down white?

>>11112004
>Autistic screeching intensifies
>>11112040
To describe nature is a logical consequence of finding out how it is. It is necessary to find out how nature is before a description can be formulated. That's the scientific method.
Observation is followed by hypothesis.
The suggestion that physics (a description of nature) reveals nothing of how nature is, is* completely dumb, regardless of what is "the task" of physics. Please go shit up some other thread.

>>10958824
Why not exactly as accurate?

>absolute velocity doesn't exist
>moving clocks tick slower
choose one and only one relativitycucks

>put a clock on every object in the universe
>check which clock is ticking the slowest
congratulations, you now know which object is the OBJECTIVELY AND ABSOLUT fastest in the universe, inversely you also know the slowest object. you may have to adjust for gravitational time dilation but that's easy

>NOOOOOOO YOU CANT DO THAT, EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE
kek keep seething

>>10855544
>go to african city
>see one (1) ebola patient
>order entire city to be glassed
day is saved

>as far as I can tell

>>10815519
139 here and over

>>10714914
Truth

>deliberately flubbed the calc 2 final

so you think your smart, faggot? try this:

a square is inscribed in an equilateral triangle. the equilateral triangle has a perimeter of 36. what is the area of the whole triangle minus the area of the square?

>>10415043
>you can apply the scientific method to everything in the phenomenal world
Do a double-blind experiment on prayer. The entity being prayed to needs not know if the prayer is placebo or not.

[eqn]0\,+\,0\,+\,0\,+\,\cdots \;=\; \lim_{n\;\to\;\infty}\, \sum_{i\;=\;1}^n \frac1n \;=\; \lim_{n\;\to\;\infty}\,\frac nn \;=\; \lim_{n\;\to\;\infty}\, 1 \;=\;1[/eqn]