/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11315898
>> all the adjustments are in one direction
They're not, why are you lying?

>all serve purely to validate the original hypothesis.
They don't even affect the original hypothesis, the raw data still shows warming.

>http://joannenova.com.au/2015/06/if-it-cant-be-replicated-it-isnt-science-bom-admits-temperature-adjustments-are-secret/
This is just a bunch of bullshit editorializing.

>http://hidethedecline.eu/
What about this is relevant?

>>11315903
Nice strawman, all corrections are explained: https://judithcurry.com/2014/07/07/understanding-adjustments-to-temperature-data/