/sci/ - Science & Math

That's what I get for not checking the catalog.... I made >>14776647 just a few short minutes ago. I suppose I'll copy over.

Since there are a number of articles being posted suggesting that the James Webb Space Telescope has "disproved" the Big Bang Theory, I thought it worthwhile to start a thread about it.

https://principia-scientific.com/do-james-webb-telescope-images-disprove-the-big-bang-theory/

>So we were confident the JWST would show the same thing—which it already has, for galaxies having redshifts as high as 12. Put another way, the galaxies that the JWST shows are just the same size as the galaxies near to us, if it is assumed that the universe is not expanding and redshift is proportional to distance.

https://thepulse.one/2022/08/17/new-james-webb-data-suggests-thebig-bang-may-have-never-happened-according-to-some/

>Many of these new images show redshifts higher than ever seen before, which would place some of them approximately 250 million years before the Big Bang.

Here's something that's an oldie but a goodie too, Malcom Bowden, a Christian who believes in the Geocentric model of the Universe, attempts to disprove the Big Bang Theory in 2010. Notice his arguments on Redshift.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNYSIFhtDbU

Quite an interesting thing, yes? If the Big Bang Theory is disproved, Scientific Dogma that has existed unquestioned since the 1970's is suddenly shattered and a new theory of the origins of the universe must be established. What are your thoughts, /sci/?

>>14764407
This guy gets it. Why am I trying to find intelligent discussion on 4chan? I thought /sci/ was a better board than to believe the pop-articles.

Since there are a number of articles being posted suggesting that the James Webb Space Telescope has "disproved" the Big Bang Theory, I thought it worthwhile to start a thread about it.

https://principia-scientific.com/do-james-webb-telescope-images-disprove-the-big-bang-theory/

>So we were confident the JWST would show the same thing—which it already has, for galaxies having redshifts as high as 12. Put another way, the galaxies that the JWST shows are just the same size as the galaxies near to us, if it is assumed that the universe is not expanding and redshift is proportional to distance.

https://thepulse.one/2022/08/17/new-james-webb-data-suggests-thebig-bang-may-have-never-happened-according-to-some/

>Many of these new images show redshifts higher than ever seen before, which would place some of them approximately 250 million years before the Big Bang.

Here's something that's an oldie but a goodie too, Malcom Bowden, a Christian who believes in the Geocentric model of the Universe, attempts to disprove the Big Bang Theory in 2010. Notice his arguments on Redshift.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNYSIFhtDbU

Quite an interesting thing, yes? If the Big Bang Theory is disproved, Scientific Dogma that has existed unquestioned since the 1970's is suddenly shattered and a new theory of the origins of the universe must be established. What are your thoughts, /sci/?