/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6076104
It is the very best of the best that wins a nobel prize.

Who the fuck are these "run of the mill" shit scientists you think are getting Nobel prizes? WTF?

>>6013736

>>4919848

I suggest instead of being extremely pretentious on an anonymous message board, you go and learn about what you're talking about before being condescending to people who do.

>>4776515

/sci/ fails because two anons disagree?

pic very much related

>>4762624
>Engineers have a strong base of physics and mathematics

That is the funniest shit I heard all week!

>>4702420
>engineer
>intellegent

>>4695745
You sir.... are a comedy genius!
Keep the jokes coming!

>>4685488

>>4652462
I fell very sorry for you

>>4409291
>doesn't know what "fundemetal forces" are
>thinks it is literally about "forces"

LMFAO.
Show me any standard model reference what uses the concept of "force" in the equations, or notation. (Hint* There are none)

>>4374485

>>4329371
A sphere will approach a "dot" as its radius decreases, but so will a ton of other shapes.

It is incorrect to assume that an expanding dot is a sphere. That does not follow form the fact that a sphere will a small radius could look like a dot.

Your logic is wrong.
A=>B, DOES NOT MEAN B=>A

>>4215225
>claiming that engineers make the most money out of any profession

>implying bankers don't make more then engineers

>implying actors don't make more then engineers (and dont even go to school)

You keep thinking you are making points, you aren't. Please take some time to review basic "logic" and how to construct a proper argument. Right now you sound as "dumb as an engineer".

Yes, engineers make a decent amount of money. SO DO A THOUSAND OTHER PROFESSIONS (including scientists).

>>4199004
>Right, but outside of any lifeform's perspective, what does the universe "look" like?

YOUR WHOLE NOTION IS SHIT. YOUR QUESTION IS MEANINGLESS.

There is no "actual universe", no "universal perspective". There is only "perspectives of the universe" from observers. If there are no observers, there are no perspectives.

>>4174089
I don't "assume" they are false. I know they are false, so do all other scientists. Evolution has already been observed and documented countless fucking times.

It isn't my fucking fault you don't stay apprised of scientific progress son.

>>4064469

Yeah, and you're third author on a PNAS paper.

lol, he's cute.

>>3968519

http://www.4chan.org/faq#sectrip

Man, get a tip code. This is almost hilarious.

CAPTCHA RELATED, "siansol trip"!

Good luck getting a design job in any industry worth mentioning. Enjoy your graduate scheme as a stress engineer

>wow, posted 3 times becuase i cant type properly

you're willing to pay 5 grand! No wonder they tell you that you need meds

>>3655293
>Thinks someone who didnt go to college can actually follow that

lol at all the assburgers /sci/

the only acceptable interpretation is fingers extended as digits

>>3464090
>there's no real health problems with "skinnyfat"

"Both fat and muscle take up glucose from the blood in response to insulin stimulation, but the capacity of muscle in this regard far exceeds that of adipose tissue per unit weight (DeFronzo, 1997). Existing control mechanisms for carbohydrate homeostasis were established over evolutionary time during which ancestral body composition almost never approached the extremes of hyperadiposity and sarcopenia manifested by many contemporary humans. For such individuals a given insulin secretory pulse, in response to a carbohydrate-containing meal, now produces less reduction in blood glucose levels than would have been achieved for prior humans with evolutionarily "appropriate" body composition. Additional, "extra" pancreatic insulin secretion is required to produce glucose homeostasis. This constitutes functional insulin resistance, a pathophysiological state exacerbated by low muscular metabolic activity (another result of exercise deficit). (Eaton & Eaton, 1998) . . .Prevalence of type 2 diabetes (that related to insulin resistance and, by far, the most common form) has multiplied 10-fold in the United States since the 1930’s as the increasing disconnect between caloric accessibility and energy expenditure has produced and ever-larger number of obese, sarcopenic Americans."

--S. Boyd Eaton, MD and Stanley B. Eaton III "Evolution, Diet and Health"

>>3270664
You need proof that Santa Clause exists, just read a book dumbshit!

(plenty of pro santa books out there)