/sci/ - Science & Math

looks real to me

Soiboi spacecucks think this is real.

SpaceX can't make a spacecraft as beautiful as this.

>>11291262
>thinks this is real

>>10820294
>Because I'm tired of having to tackle each little argument made by a moon hoaxer, that website covers the general points in sufficient detail.
Why do you trust the arguments made on the website? Is it because you want the moon landings to be real so you'll accept anything?
>They're under no obligation to counter argue over a point that has been settled for decades.
They absolutely are, they're funded by the public and they're the ones that claim to have landed on the moon. There's no one better to prove what they claimed to have done.
>No. Because the United States was very public about their moon program. Live television, broadcasting the mission progress, public documents that anyone can go look up, etc. The fact that the landings happened was so widely known that it would look incredibly stupid for the Soviets to deny.
But with this logic, if the landings were faked, the Soviets still wouldn't have called them out because they would have looked incredibly stupid, which answers why they didn't deny them.
>Prove that the Soviets were working with the US at the time. I don't just mean show some times the US and the USSR occasionally agreed on things, I mean actual evidence such as classified documents secret trades, and taped conversations between officials about this alliance
They were working with each other because they were both involved in the same goal - the US landing on the moon. The USSR allowed this to happen by playing the role of the loser, they were supposedly ahead of the US in terms of rocketry and getting humans in space, but then they started to falter, while the US advanced. To you that's just a coincidence, to me that's them working together.

>(and just before you go off on a tangent about this, also prove that the landings were faked). Just speculating that such an alliance exists despite all evidence to the co
webm related, notice the wobble of the prop as it spins? Impossible if it was actually in the very near vacuum of space.

>>10218491

>>10205197

>>10081180
YEAH REALLY HARD TO FAKE THIS FUCKING EMBARRASSING HORSESHIT.

>>10002521
>thinks webm is real space footage
"Yes"

>>9931610
Lack of talent and drive. Webm related, they don't make 'em like this any more. This beauty beats the fuck out of anything NASA have made recently.