/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12363114
>that's literally how you explain magnetism
No, it's how you describe it. That's what the quotes are, descriptions. An explanation would tell me why the magnet has poles described and why little magnets make big magnets, as described.

>>10901646
>Time is a phenomena because we observe and directly experience it
Observe it? How do you observe it? Are you confusing it with something else? Experience time? How am I supposed to "experience" a measurement/frequency? Ridiculous.

>Illusions are also phenomena
>the distortion of the perception of reality is a phenomena

It's like saying water becomes completely different if I take LSD and observe it to be such.

>>10699041
??? See you're assuming that the object is "traveling" at "super-sonic speed" because you're thinking in terms of what our current technology is capable of. We use engines, turbines..things that move and rotate in order to create torque that transfers to a surface to be conquered. Typically they use fuel or something that burns, a pressure difference must be created somehow. The craft must alter itself to travel, this is a fact. We don't have technology that can do what >>10698986 describes, in fact the methods we use in our technology and the research we've done indeed proves that it could not do these feats without destruction to the craft. So obviously this craft is altering the physicality of what it is traversing, since it itself as a physical object cannot do so.

TL:DR: It doesn't alter itself (as a physical object) to "travel", it "alters" what it's traversing to "travel". It's completely logical and the only way it could function. If you want to travel through water faster then you boil or turn the water into steam, it's still "water" afterall. Or you just move the water out of the way before you go through it. I WONDER IF MAGNETISM IS CAPABLE OF ALTERING WATER OR SOMETHING TO THAT DEGREE. THE WORLD MAY NEVER KNOW, EVEN THOUGH IT HAS A MAGNETIC FIELD ITSELF.

However, if you alter the state of something to get somewhere is that really "traveling"?

>>10286731
>Matter is also a wave.
A wave is what something does.
Matter is what it does?

>>10286211
You can explain and cause every phenomena to happen without the use of time. The "time" is just a recording of the magnitude of said phenomena. You can drive faster to work by expending more gas at a "faster rate", but that doesn't mean you're "adding time" or "subtracting time" from what's actually occurring in reality. Time isn't impeding you, it's the medium which you reside in that's impeding you. The air pressure causes you to "travel slower", but that's because you encounter physical tangible resistance.
You can alter this medium or the vehicle that passes in the medium, but to equate that to "altering time" is absurd. By that logic everything is just "time", which is obviously not the case because >>10285867 Time has no properties.

>>10013091
You seem to confuse dimension with universe.
Time is merely a measurement in space which expands and creates the illusion of speed and distance.

Take this Jpeg for example. It does not move yet it looks like it's moving. Why? The mind, being a microcosm is afflicted by the very primordial "trickery" used to form the universe.