/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9748166
>Do that and you'll have some credibility.
Here you go, faggot. Solar filter footage of the sun setting over the water, showing the sun go from completely visible to entirely beyond the curve of the earth.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-z7O7LddYs
As a bonus, the video is taken from a drone, ruling out your claim that it's a perspective trick caused by putting the camera on the ground. And even better, the drone is able to see the sun set TWICE simply by rising upwards (not forwards, UPWARDS) and seeing the sun's edge briefly peek up over the horizon again. This is entirely incompatible with your flat earth model.

>Newton wrote it, enough evidence for you?
You claimed >>9747945 to have seen the (allegedly too far to be seen with visible light) set sun using radio waves or infrared light. Now you're backpedaling to lying about what Newton wrote. (Remember, Newton understood that the Earth is an oblate spheroid, not a flat disc.)

>That video is evidence for the flat earth, it proves a local sun, pic related.
say it all you like, it doesn't make it true.
>not centered equally, forcing the horizon to obscure more
this is gibberish with absolutely no basis in fact.
>natural layer of distortion/obfuscation created by the water
making shit up again, are we? also, you said that views over bodies of water are PREFERABLE since there's no possibility of topographic highs or vegetation obscuring sunset.
>local light source
you're saying that the patch of sky right next to the sun (which is still visible above the horizon) is brighter than the patch of sky further away from the sun? no shit, sherlock; if the atmosphere doesn't have to scatter light as strongly for light to be transmitted to the viewer from a particular angle, the patch of sky at that angle will appear brighter. this is literally the same thing as the west side of the sky being brighter during sunset.

>>9740246
>It was pretty stupid so I ignored most of it.
the intellectual apex of /pol/, ladies

>>9525003
the term for this tendency (of people who believe in one conspiracy to believe in ALL THE CONSPIRACIES) is called "crank magnetism".
if you can be fooled once, you can be fooled again...