[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9916590 [View]
File: 10 KB, 220x201, 220px-Nick_Bostrom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9916590

What is the correct interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?

>> No.9566897 [View]
File: 10 KB, 220x201, bostrom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9566897

Okay /sci/, I have fallen for this meme way too hard. Is there any way to debunk the Simulation Hypothesis other than just to stop believing in it?

Brief Rundown: -
One of these propositions is true
>the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage
>any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof)
>we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.

It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]