/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15667375
No it is not, idiot. The copenhagen specifically makes no claim on the ontic status of that which was not measured
>In quantum mechanics, counterfactual definiteness (CFD) is the ability to speak "meaningfully" of the definiteness of the results of measurements that have not been performed (i.e., the ability to assume the existence of objects, and properties of objects, even when they have not been measured)
You couldn't design a more backward

>>15286763
>Can this Copenhatin shit finally be put to rest?
The copenhagen interpretation makes no claim about particles going through two slits. It's a positivist interpretation that speaks only of measurements or events. They had the view that the formalism was a a math tool to make predictions. It states nothing about the ontology of what waves or particles actually are or what they are doing beyond what data can be observed and quantified. They all CORRECTLY, somehow, intuited that the only thing related to the quantum world that need be rendered by the rendering engine rendering the VR called the physical world is the EFFECTS of the quantum world measured by devices or screens or computer memory. So there IS NO QUANTUM WORLD, (see pic).