/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11387624
>>11387643
best JSRF song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdl-LIH1XgM

Glue just doesn't work. And even if did, it wouldn't work the way you think it does.

>What is this stupid giant S?
the calculus swoosh

>>11114353

What IQ do I need to understand calculus?

Partial fractions decomposition is too difficult. Are there any better integration techniques than the standard ones you are taught? Does this really need to be so cumbersome?

>>10491265
"light" isn't the defining quantity m8, it's just an electromagnetic wave

>>10416965
you can't get "published" in a week because it involves back and forth with the conference or journal. you can "submit" your paper though.
any any rate, it takes more than a week to write a quality paper.

read a survey paper for your topic of interest.
learn what the state of the art is.
think about what's wrong with the state of the art, or pose some question you don't think has been answered yet.
think of how to fix or answer that.
do some experiments / simulations / write some proof, etc. to demonstrate or prove that your fix or answer is good.
then write a paper about what you found.
getting good manuscripts written should be your goal.
if you have good ideas you're whatever. any scrub can come up with ideas. if you show you're a producer, i.e. you can make the jump from "idea" to "experiment" to "manuscript" that's another story entirely.

alternatively, you can write a survey paper yourself.
read the state of the art papers and try to summarize the results in one paper.
analyze the body of study results together, try to draw parallels and connections between them.
suggest avenues of future research.
there are journals that take survey papers exclusively and of course preprints. these papers will tend to be "write-only" unless you really do an awesome job or have a remarkable insight, but at least you can point to a manuscript you wrote as a proof of ability.

>>10387654
>>10387700

Пaцaны, кaк вычиcлить интeгpaл?

My brofessor calls asymptotes singularities. Isn't that the shit inside of black holes? So a black hole is an asymptote?

>>10311311

Hello OP, you may find this helpful.

t. anon

>>10164876
right

>>10099487
>If they actually knew who posted here they wouldn't be so quick to belittle people.
I'm not belittling people, just laughing at faggot who keeps reposting the same flawed proof verbatim for years.
He saw an anon got recognized for that superpermutation proof sketch and got inspired to "publish" (spam) his shit some more.
Also, no one gives a fuck who you are; if you can't handle that, go back to plebbit or twitter or wherever you came from.

>>10099612
A piece of shit gains value if you make it really complicated? Interesting. Anyways, why are you telling US about it? It's arXiv you need to convince.

When performing a change of variable substitution on an indeterminate limit, how do you determine what the new variable should be approaching? Is it the number that makes the denominator equal to zero?

Sigma is a valid alternative to the calculus swoosh. Prove me wrong.

Protip: you can't

>>9820938
Lebesgue integration is "advanced mathematics" according to Americans

pic related is a recent work by me and a fellow /sci/ anon

>be me

>too stupid to learn galgulous

>use limits to compute the derivative still because I gannot remember the laws of calculus

>For integrals I still use the method of exhaustion and Rainmann sums

>on takehome assignments I literally just use the digital scale approximation method and then draw the swoosh symbol in front of my answer to make it look like I did it for real

>when asked for the exact answer I always just rationalize whatever my approximation was ie if I have 26.34 the 'exact answer' will be 2634/100

>still passing the course because I do well on the takehome assignment

>>9764487
What do you mean?