[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12772605 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1614351713248.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12772605

Why is HCQ considered dangerous but mRNA vaccines aren't?

>> No.10901348 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1436626856579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10901348

I didn't go to Standford, but another high tier school. If you are an exceptionally gifted individual, you should really go to a high tier school, because only there you will be challenged enough to foster your talent. However, let's be honest, most of us are just average or slightly above it. Go to a high tier school for undergrad and you will struggle. If you struggle, it will be exceptionally hard to keep your GPA high enough to be admitted to a good PhD program. For many programs, having a bad GPA is simply a knock out factor. So going to Stanford, if you intend to go for a PhD might actually hurt you in the long run.

Having a degree from Stanford will of course open you many doors into lower tier schools or industry, which is certainly a plus, but of course comes at a price. Mostly money and time.

If you really intend to go for an academic career, go to a decent, but not onverly crazy institution for your undergrad. Do well, get a good GPA, learn all the shit you want at a reasonable pace. Most undergrad stuff is actually pretty standard and could be done anywhere. Most average and decent schools focus more on teaching, while the top tier schools often focus more on research, which is pretty much useless to you as an undergrad. Once you have your undergrad, move on to a better school for your PhD, this is where it will actually get serious.

>> No.10261355 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, AC25F4C8-A07B-4388-9332-15C81E541C42.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10261355

>>10261301
:3

>>10261314
>>10261319
Thanks anons, im trying to implement object recognition with a support vector machine but I wanted to make sure I understood machine learning a bit more instead of mindlessly plugging into stuff I know nothing about.
So I figured I could implement a basic linear regression machine learning from scratch but I dont want to just copy what someone else did without understanding the decisions being made.
But if its not that intuitive then I guess I feel less bad

>> No.9797260 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1509752647097.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9797260

Is anybody here frustrated that their IQ is almost completely static? it keeps nagging me that I will always be at the same level of intelligence no matter what I do. I hate it. It sucks. My limit is basically determined by the flip of a coin.

>> No.9780751 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1509752647097.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9780751

Is it possible to understand something without visualization? is this what the pathagoreans were doing when using geometry as a base for every other mathematical field?

>> No.9499690 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1476876939266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9499690

>>9485989
>simulation theory
but anywhere along the chain of simulations, it would require less resources to simulate the experiences of a single brain rather then a world of brains. Therefore, everything I perceive is a simulation, and the world to my back doesn't exist. Everyone else is a scripted AI. It would also be easier to fabricate my memories than simulate my entire lifetime, so at every given moment, I must logically assume I came into existence right then. But wait! I only know simulation could be possible because of memories and experiences I've had, therefore, my entire assumption of simulation chains are brought into question...

>> No.9408471 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1476876939266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9408471

>>9407945
>be compsci major
>find Calculus, Differential Equations, Linear Algebra etc. not very difficult unlike most of my classmates
>Wish I could be a Math major to laugh at the compsci brainlets, but that isn't where the jobs are

>> No.9367629 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1506641903745.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9367629

continued from
>>9367601
also
>there is a strong and proven link between race and intelligence.
im not saying there isnt , im actually 99.99999% certain there is as there is a link between anything and any other thing in something as complex as humans interacting in a civilization . im just saying we should study and quantify that link properly and rigorously .

perhaps find some measurable physiological indicator of ''''intelligence'''' that we can measure in a lab and link it to people's genes that we can measure in a lab .

i think any form of 'self reporting' or any study which required humans to voluntarily do something or samples measurements of humans in a way which biases it towards certain groups of humans and away from others is a shitty meme and does not deserve to be called 'science'. to use this word to describe such dogshit and in the same breath to use it on things like kepler measurements is absurd.

physics went from some dude watching things fall while counting counting time with his heartbeats to detecting gravity waves by measuring distances of 10(10^−18 )m , if social '''science''' wants to be taken seriously it has to make a leap of this magnitude .

>> No.8461705 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, ducko.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8461705

>>8458059
Collapse? It never existed. Perhaps very briefly at the formation of America, but the civilization avarice cycle has degenerated our so called leaders into literal pedophile murderers.

Solution is to remove genes to remove vav. bioengineered nano guided viruses. Nanobots could use heuristic treepoint decisions s.t. controls on specific dna material.

This could exterminate the ashkenazi jewish ethnicity entirely, as well as target people who are: psychopaths, pedophiles, sadists.

Essentially we could shape the future of humanity and remove for criminal minds in high positions of power using this technology.

As for anyone who thinks this is infeasible, here's the "father" of nanotechnology explaining some of the features of nanotechnology in the near future 2030-2100.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2y-NYyoXFM

The trick here is to develop this technology outside of governments knowing its potential implications for a lot of their depraved members. Now that's the challenge.

This is perhaps the most ambitious project in human history, and absolutely must succeed if humanity is to be free of malevolent authority and criminal psychopaths hijacking societies.

>> No.7386315 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1436480886133.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7386315

>>7386181
Entertaining as fuck. I would love to play a game or watch a movie based on his world.

No one else would be able to take time traveling jews fro space, Atlantis, all religions and the global consciousness grid and roll it into one coherent world view.

>> No.7383335 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1430568662086.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7383335

What would the feasibility be of solving the west coast's ongoing drought problems by placing a bunch of nuclear reactors on barges and having them do nothing else but evaporate a shitton of seawater off the coast.

>> No.7354368 [View]
File: 213 KB, 887x900, I like where this is headed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7354368

>>7354360
It's not a claim, it's a principle

>> No.7257440 [View]
File: 232 KB, 887x900, 1430568662086.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7257440

What's the best way to git gud at linear algebra as fast as possible? The way the grad student is teaching my class is completely retarded and I have no idea what the fuck is going on. I'm in danger of not passing.

What's the best resource to teach myself the material?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]