/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15288615
>>15288621
Hi anon. First things first, you're not late to this thread by any means! An anon is never late nor is he early, he replies precisely when he means to. I keep replying to the answer to my problems until the end of the thread.

Secondly your answer is correct of course. And your solution is amazing. Love it. I think you went about it quite cleverly. I have heard of combinatorial designs before but I actually never checked them out, might be time to do so.

Thank you very much for your solution. I appreciate the time and effort you gave to it.
>I'm typing this on my phone.
me too, quite often. Though not right now.

Have a nice day!

Okay so frankly the problem was disappointing in a sense. I didn't realize it was this simple but perhaps I should have seen that before solving it.I just looked at the probability of both having 1,2,...,5 heads and the answer popped up right away.
>>15025855
That is indeed correct mister. Good job and thank you for taking the time to solve and reply to this problem I shared. And while I just said that I was dissapointed a bit about the problem, what you say regarding vandermonde changes that. I'll look into that and let me say I appreciate you telling me about it.
>>15026012
That is poggers, sir.Very kind of you to tell me about this. Thank you.