[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15573105 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15573105

we're all in the future. everything you hear or see in the internet happened in the past.
I call it the recording hypothesis.
Unironically a better theory than strings.

>> No.15545397 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15545397

1. one of the most unscientific assumptions you can make is that patterns in nature are intuitive and symmetrical; no: patterns on a 3X3 matrix are not 3X3 patterns; nature may be more complex than that.
2. you can train on them; a professional mathematician on logical problems will score high; he may be stupid on other subjects.
3. speed of results is an absolutely retarded metric: nobody gives a fuck if einstein took 2 days or 2 weeks to write his theories.

>> No.15545392 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15545392

1. one of the most unscientific assumptions you can make is that patterns in nature are intuitive and symmetrical; no patterns on a 3X3 matrix are not 3X3 pattern; nature may be more complex than that.

2. You can train on them; a professional mathematician on logical problems will score high; he may be stupid on other subjects

3. Speed of results is an absolutely retarded metric: nobody gives a fuck of einstead took 2 days or weeks to write his theories.

>> No.15539241 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15539241

there are people unironically in this thread right now, who believe they are scientists, and at the same time believe in a supernatural god.

>> No.15519326 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15519326

it's trendy for scientists to say "but they may be based on different chemistry" but really: it's a brainlet approach; it's far more likely to be based on exactly the same chemistry because guess what asshole: it's the same universe; unless you speak about crossing universes.

e.g. ask any structural engineer about the feasibility of gigantic animals; they are inevitably slow as shit compared to their size because that's the materials that exist in the universe; it's why an ant is extremely fast and strong compared to its size ..and all other insects too.

>> No.15508487 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15508487

and they don't realize that selfishness is a sign of lower intelligence. if you think you know everything then you are the brainlet.

>> No.15430365 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15430365

mass can have certain arrangements that produce electric charging that in turn creates electric fields that in turn create electromagnetic radiation that make radio waves that are in turn vibrating a piece of metal than in turn creates alternating electrical charges that are in turn picked up by certain arrangements of mass that in turn interpret than as certain arrangements of 0s and 1s that are illegal.

>> No.15408989 [View]
File: 631 KB, 976x850, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15408989

we defined the meter, to be exactly 1 / 299792458 seconds per meter of light-travelling.

why?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]