/sci/ - Science & Math

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503&http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf
m?abstract_id=1871503

>the most scientifically literate and numerate subjects were slightly less likely, not more, to see climate change as a serious threat than the least scientifically literate and numerate ones

lol, umad uneducated aspie alarmists

Stupid republicans are uneducated - they have no respect for science and ruined the US space program:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/science/02nasa.html

Don't mind those intolerant republicans! They're just a bunch of stupid uneducated rednecks.

>>2926614
>adolescent IQ
>adult political affiliation.

Liberals can't even interpret their own graphs. Protip: It doesn't measure the IQ of people simultaneously to their political affiliation. The IQ of someone when they were 12 isn't very germane to anything 20 years later.

Here's one that actually looks at this issue properly. Enjoy being uneducated, liberals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fig_57_-_men_4-yr_college_degrees.JPG

>>2875896
Here's probably going to show you that table that shows red states have lower average iq than blue states. Which of course confuses republican states with republican voters. Republican states have more blacks, for example, but blacks are *less* likely to be republican.

So you need to look at individual data, not state data. And the individual data shows republicans are more educated.

>>2813699
Well, that's possible. It's not like I have any graphs showing that republicans are more educated than democrats.

Oh wait, I do!

>>2813694
Heh, well fair enough. Although if you're just using it for that purpose, there's not much point in even doing the test. They're not going to know what a t-test is anyway. Just make something up.

Question /sci/
What has Dawkins ACTUALLY accomplished that doesn't include his atheism stuff? I'm looking for concepts, theories, etc that have helped advance a field of science.
pic highly unrelated