/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15160828
>They do move into the vacuum.... and then fall back to earth
If they do move into the vacuum, that means that the area they just were in would now be available for the layers of higher pressure below them to move into. See picrel.

>would be
Provably would be. Again, my claims are substantiated with empirical evidence. Yours are not.

>A completely unsubstantiated claim.
It’s substantiated every time a pressurized box is opened in a vacuum chamber. Objectively, as the size of the vacuum chamber increases, and the relative size of the pressurized box gets smaller, the measurable gradient after opening the lid gets less and less, both inside the box and outside of the box in the vacuum chamber. The fact that earth is a limited “small box” and the space is a near infinite “vacuum chamber” means ther would be no measurable gradient on earth void of physical containment. This kills your model. You’re just salty you can’t refute it so you’re only option left is to dig your heels in and keep denying reality.

>>so gravity is basically an infinite sized vacuum chamber.
Typo
*so space is basically an infinite sized vacuum chamber.

>So you've never stepped foot in an institution of higher learning
I let my arguments stand on their own merit bc I’m confident in my position unlike you who feels the need to appeal to your own authority bc you know position is weak and unconvincing