/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15759785
>No it's not. It's 4D.
I wasnt asking, Barkun, Hyper (and Sub) Dimensional Geomtry is my specialty. Dodecahedron is 2.5D, its still 2D planes arranges in 3D.

>>15759787
>It accounts for natural rotation (post: zoom, transmit, etc )
There is no reason why you cannot say the same about a Dodecahedron.

Its infinitely hyperbolic linear measure of Phi, thats what happens when you force a uni-dimensional object in hyperdimension, they become hyperbolic on an axis, it looks 4D but its 3.

>Dodecahedron is for "Universe".
It is also a 2.5-Dimensional Pentagon. 2D is a regular Pentagon.

3D Pentagon is a Torus. Magnetism shape. Shapes become things.

>>15315223
>incoherent rambling schizo garbage

I guess one does stop learning and starts guessing...

https://youtu.be/501KfaQ4Huk

MATHS. LERN IT. BECOM IT. PROFIT.

>>15285083
>when they have nothing to show off which justifies that status.
Lol, dumbass...what part of "he isnt wrong" are you illiterate to?

His works are quiet extensive and documented...you should study and stop being a retarded charlatan on the internet.

AKA STOP LYING ON THE INTERNET.

>"He doesnt sound like me, an idiot, so he must be stupid, because I cant make sense of it."

Dunning Kruger much?

"If magnets are not real...does that mean we are not real?"
-Garfield

>>15242524
>How do you know? How do you know space isn't a substance that can move and flow?
Just my "philosophy" I suppose. Tesla and Ken Wheeler made good points about this, and Ken is where I heard the term "counter-space" (but our definitions of it are a little different, but thats whatev.)

As far as I know "space being a thing" wasnt a thing until Einstein and Tesla railed against it. I still used Einstein in my equations, I just had to redfine it some. Thinking in terms of "there is more vectors of reality than just the three" was critical for me, so Im not shitting on, I just feel its slightly different.

>>14884913
>because of the polygons in video games

Not him but no....because of irreducable structures of atoms and subatomic particles. Even electromagnetic waves and gravity has shape.

>the packing problem
Some normie tier trash for midwits. Begone with you.

You have any idea how intelligent you have to be to measure geometric proportions of a magnetic field?!

>>12497533

>>11207478

Specify the force, acceleration should be proportional to mass...or... idk...I dropped out of high school so...