[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12111143 [View]
File: 67 KB, 440x726, Jack_and_Ellen_Yoho_BC_1971.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12111143

I'm trying to phrase the uncountability of PN in second order arithmetic - can you verify my thinking...

Naturally, I phrase it as non-existence of a bijection between N and (N->{0,1}), which we can uncurry to (N x N) -> {0,1}.
We can speak about those as functions by applying a pairing n->(k,m) twice (those functions are encoded as subsets of N and thus we're still second order).
Now I just need to express the bijection property.

A bijectionN N->{0,1}) as encoded by ((N x N) x {0,1}) means

for all m,n, if
??? profit ???
then m=n
I still need to figure out the ??? part in terms of triples

[I couldn't find anything on Cantor diagonalization without set theory]

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]