/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5113435
Important in the sense of being successful in modern western civilization (i.e. major life outcomes).

Nobody is discussing birth rates other than yourself. Your point is even sillier when you consider that Negroes evolved to have a higher birthrate because they were unable to keep their offspring alive. The only reason their population is exploding is because Whites have so much surplus productivity they can care for other people's children too. They are like pets, but nobody wants to take the responsibility to have them spayed or neutered.

>>2367990
>What you don't get is that being malicious, actively malicious and seeking to oppress people makes you inferior to a well meaning but somewhat dim black person. I would take a thousand of them over one of you.

The only malicious people here are you and your fellow liberals. Liberals are motivated by a hatred of White people. This is why liberals support policies which are destructive and biased against white people, regardless of the impact they will have on Blacks.

You yourself are here defending the forced busing program that wasted trillions for zero gains. Black people simply did not benefit from it at all. So why defend it? Because it achieved the leftist goal of harming white people. It stole a great deal of money from white taxpayers and ruined a lot of good schools making it harder for whites to get a decent education.

Another good example is what liberals did to Rhodesia. Millions of black people are starving now in Zimbabwe due to the end of white rule. So how can you claim the destruction of Rhodesia was truly motivated by a concern for the welfare of blacks? The goal again was to harm whites, not help blacks at all. This is a consistent theme across all liberal policies.