/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10443244
It doesn't exist.

If you give a prolific consumer a new technology, and he will just use it to consume more, which is exactly why the world needs saving to begin with.

The only chance we have is a massive improvement in our ethics.

>>10420836
>marco
>"do"s
>lets globalize the shit out of this biatch to more effeciently consume the non-renewable resources at an exponentially increasing rate

kek

>>10375765
>accuses others of being blinded by ideology
>touts infinite economic/population growth as the savior of humanity

lol

>>10295524
The only reason you're in favour of a carbon tax is because you believe that infinite economic/population growth is possible and desirable due to futuristic technological improvements you know nothing about, and are not remotely involved in.

I suspect you are connected to either the banking or construction industries (most likely heavily invested in those, or receiving funding from them), totally scientifically illiterate (that explains why you think endless economic growth is possible), and complete ignorant of the ongoing and exponentially increasing destruction of the biosphere due to things other than global warming.

I shouldn't even bother responding to a sleazy ambulance chasing shill who wastes something like 5 posts trying to convince people that a graph with positive slope isn't increasing because it doesn't support your agenda... you're mentally ill. You'll believe whatever bullshit you have to to justify your bloated lifestyle. When it comes right down to it you're just as bad as the f-350 driving sledneck coal mining hick.

>>10206328
congrats on making excuses for one of the most egregious examples of hypocrisy and waste inherent to the system ever displayed. you must be a very happy bloated little consumer,perfectly content to gorge yourself on it. disgusting

this ones shooped but still a gooder

>>9761169
i mean you can take pills or undergoe procedures to address the symptoms of course, but your condition is incurable