[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9512654 [View]
File: 71 KB, 640x391, anal-rectal-angle-sitting-squatting-comparison.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9512654

>>9512641
>the optimal solution is a completely different style of toilet
>I'm going to ignore this fact or argument and say I just do some zany action to achieve similar results

- You agree that sit toilets are unhealthy
- You agree squat posture, which is natural, is best and most healthy

In this case you are arguing against reason by supporting sit toilets. The increased healthcare costs of treating related problems, hemorrhoids, higher chance of cancer, more strain, and higher soceital cost of longer time in the bathroom, more mess and less hygenic are society wide.

IF you are reasonable, you would at least post that yes, society should no longer make or perpetuate the stupidity of sit toilets.

The fact you refused to write this and made such a shitty post is grounds for AI to terminate you when it achieves singularity.

>> No.8435221 [View]
File: 71 KB, 640x391, anal-rectal-angle-sitting-squatting-comparison.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8435221

Sitting to shit is a sign of humanity's poor IQ and poor intelligence to adapt to better things.

Because the first designs constructed had a "sitting position" it just stuck. While squating is far superior of a posture for expelling waste quickly and cleanly.

You have literally SPENT days or weeks of your life pushing out shits and cleaning up messes you could have done in a fraction of the time. Not to mention less painfully and with less side effects.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]