/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15256068
By the way, the pic rel is from everett's (father of the MWI) original paper on the many worlds idea. He says himself that his theory is contrived to take the observer out of the picture
>If not, we are forced to admit that systems which contain observers are not subject to the same kind of quantum-mechanical description as we admit for all other physical systems. The question cannot be ruled out as lying in the domain of psychology.

>>15157201
Pic related is proof of this claim
>>15157267
that the MWI (many worlds interpretation) of QM was a materialist cope to remove mind from QM. This picrel is from the original paper by hugh everett himself. Specifically, see this
>If not, we are forced to admit that systems which contain observers are not subject to the same kind of quantum-mechanical description as we admit for all other physical systems.
CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT A PHYSICAL OBJECT, hence why you get the quotes of the founders of QM about mind and consciousness. THEY KNEW. This idealism has been attempted to be covered up with things like decoherence and the many worlds.
Decoherence is another cope, but as the very founders of the decoherence concept admit, decoherence doesn't solve the measurement problem.