/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14816163
>Why did the authors make the comparison between adverse events and COVID hospitalization if COVID hospitalization is random?
The answer is clear from what I just said but to spell it out because I feel like it's probably needed with you: They did this to create a non rigorous impetus for rigorous and formal harm-benefit studies. They close the paper with:
>Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, as we approach 2 years after release of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level data remain inaccessible
So if they had the trial data they could eliminate this random hospitalization variable, obviously. They know the hospitalization comparison they made is not rigorous, that's the entire point. They, like any rational person should, don't want to blindly accept what these scandal-ridden criminal big phrama companies are spoon feeding them.

You don't need to respond to this post.